Chickasaw vs Sudanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Sudanese
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Sudanese
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Sudanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 52.9%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Sudanese | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.77% | 
| Maximum | 21.2% | 6.7% | 
| Range | 18.8% | 5.9% | 
| Mean | 7.4% | 3.2% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 0.92% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 0.97% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 0.96% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% | 
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% | 
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% | 
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% | 
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |