Chickasaw vs Sudanese Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,968,006 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.524 and weighted average of $58,281, a difference of 8.5%.

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Panamanian ($58,266, a difference of 0.030%), Malaysian ($58,244, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian ($58,243, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from El Salvador ($58,226, a difference of 0.10%), and Delaware ($58,214, a difference of 0.11%).