Chickasaw vs Sudanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Sudanese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Chickasaw
Sudanese
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Sudanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,744,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 56.4% |
| Range | 38.3% | 55.2% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 13.4% |
| Median | 12.2% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Sudanese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Turkish (11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Jordan (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Fijian (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 87.0 /100 | #113 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Ukrainians | 86.9 /100 | #114 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 86.3 /100 | #115 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Iraqis | 86.3 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Icelanders | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 84.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Malaysians | 84.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 84.0 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Fijians | 83.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.6 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.8% |