Cherokee vs Jamaican Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Jamaican
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Jamaicans
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Jamaican Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,625,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.96%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Jamaican |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 49.4% |
Range | 50.6% | 44.8% |
Mean | 17.8% | 14.1% |
Median | 16.3% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Jamaicans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |