Jordanian vs Australian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Australian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Australians
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Australian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,386,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,991,142 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Australian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 29.1% |
| Range | 28.2% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 10.7% |
| Median | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Australians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |