Sudanese vs Alaska Native Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Alaska Native
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Alaska Natives
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Alaska Native Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,710,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Alaska Native |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.0% | 98.7% |
Mean | 11.5% | 21.3% |
Median | 9.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 30.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 22.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Alaska Natives by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.86%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |