Central American Indian vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Zimbabweans
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,052,023 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 50.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 94.9% | 18.8% |
| Range | 93.0% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 23.8% | 8.1% |
| Median | 17.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.5% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |