Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Alaskan Athabascan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Alaskan Athabascans
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Alaskan Athabascan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,584,402 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,695,743 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 60.0% |
Range | 28.3% | 58.5% |
Mean | 10.7% | 14.7% |
Median | 8.8% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Alaskan Athabascans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Senegalese (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.58%), Shoshone (6.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |