Carpatho Rusyn vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Romanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Romanians
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,411,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 2.1%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Romanian |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 63.2% | 70.0% |
Range | 59.5% | 66.0% |
Mean | 17.5% | 23.0% |
Median | 14.2% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 28.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Romanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), English (15.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |