Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Blackfeet Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Blackfeet
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Blackfeet
25.3%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
78.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Blackfeet Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,792,332 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,305,291 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306 and weighted average of 25.2%, a difference of 0.40%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Blackfeet |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 62.1% | 68.6% |
| Range | 58.1% | 67.5% |
| Mean | 28.5% | 29.9% |
| Median | 27.1% | 26.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.5% | 35.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Blackfeet by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Puget Sound Salish (25.3%, a difference of 0.060%), French American Indian (25.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (25.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Albanian (25.4%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Northern Africa (25.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (25.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Costa Rican (25.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Uruguayan (25.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Comanche | 85.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 25.0% |
| South Americans | 85.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 25.0% |
| Malaysians | 84.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 25.0% |
| Iroquois | 83.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 25.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 82.6 /100 | #149 | Excellent 25.1% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 82.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 25.1% |
| Taiwanese | 81.6 /100 | #151 | Excellent 25.1% |
| Uruguayans | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 25.2% |
| Blackfeet | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 78.1 /100 | #154 | Good 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 77.7 /100 | #155 | Good 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 25.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 75.8 /100 | #157 | Good 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 73.7 /100 | #158 | Good 25.3% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 73.0 /100 | #159 | Good 25.3% |
| French American Indians | 72.5 /100 | #160 | Good 25.4% |
| Albanians | 69.4 /100 | #161 | Good 25.4% |
| Shoshone | 69.0 /100 | #162 | Good 25.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 69.0 /100 | #163 | Good 25.4% |
| Koreans | 68.6 /100 | #164 | Good 25.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 25.5% |