Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Blackfeet Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Blackfeet
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Blackfeet
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Blackfeet Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,476,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 63.6%, a difference of 0.20%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 31.0% | 27.3% |
Maximum | 89.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.9% | 72.7% |
Mean | 66.3% | 65.5% |
Median | 65.4% | 64.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.0% | 57.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.0% | 72.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Blackfeet by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Bulgarian (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |