Hawaiian vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Celtic
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Hawaiians
Celtics
33.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
11.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,224,673 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 33.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,463,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 0.25%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian | Celtic |
Minimum | 8.9% | 14.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.1% | 86.0% |
Mean | 42.0% | 47.2% |
Median | 31.9% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.4% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.6% | 55.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.2% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.6% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians and Celtics by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |
Portuguese | 5.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 33.8% |