Immigrants from Guatemala vs Swiss Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Swiss
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Swiss
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Swiss Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,174,620 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 65.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,763,466 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 65.2%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Swiss |
Minimum | 35.3% | 36.4% |
Maximum | 91.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.4% | 63.6% |
Mean | 66.6% | 74.1% |
Median | 67.1% | 72.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.8% | 67.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 80.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Swiss by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), European (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (65.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |