Alsatian vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Slavic
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Slavs
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,841,437 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Slavic |
Minimum | 0.97% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 56.8% |
Range | 28.2% | 56.3% |
Mean | 7.7% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.2% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Slavs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Liberian (6.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Honduras (6.3%, a difference of 0.54%), German Russian (6.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |