Swiss vs Malaysian Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Malaysian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Swiss
Malaysians
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Malaysian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,067,054 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.59%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 40.6% | 29.0% |
| Range | 37.9% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 14.0% |
| Median | 12.1% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Malaysians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Italian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Samoan (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Inupiat (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and West Indian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| West Indians | 2.9 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |