Japanese vs Immigrants from Scotland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Scotland
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Scotland
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Scotland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,384,965 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 4.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 25.0% |
| Range | 17.6% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |