Japanese vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,443,278 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 5.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
Minimum | 0.93% | 0.25% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 20.1% |
Range | 17.6% | 19.9% |
Mean | 7.5% | 6.9% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |