Japanese vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,441,857 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 22.2% |
| Range | 17.6% | 21.2% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 6.6% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |