Greek vs Immigrants from Scotland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from Scotland
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from Scotland
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from Scotland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,531,888 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,384,965 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.55%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 25.0% |
| Range | 48.5% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 8.0% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Immigrants from Scotland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |