Japanese vs Immigrants from England Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from England
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from England
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from England Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,842,020 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from England |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 75.4% |
| Range | 17.6% | 73.1% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 13.3% |
| Median | 6.5% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |