Japanese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Guamanian/Chamorro
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Japanese
Guamanians/Chamorros
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,865,083 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.18%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 17.3% |
| Range | 17.6% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Guamanians/Chamorros by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |