Immigrants from Australia vs Chickasaw Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Chickasaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Chickasaw
10.8%
DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Chickasaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,205,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 40.9%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 52.4% |
| Range | 31.6% | 43.9% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 22.5% |
| Median | 11.1% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Cambodian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Mongolian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Afghan (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Israeli (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |