Colville vs Chickasaw Disability
COMPARE
Colville
Chickasaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Colville
Chickasaw
15.8%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Chickasaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,687,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
![Colville vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/disability/colville-vs-chickasaw-disability-chart.webp)
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 38.4% | 52.4% |
Range | 36.0% | 43.9% |
Mean | 20.4% | 22.5% |
Median | 19.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 23.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Colville and Chickasaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Creek (15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 1.7%), Puerto Rican (16.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and Tsimshian (16.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |