Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Zimbabwean Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Zimbabwean
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Zimbabweans
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Zimbabwean Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,638,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.53%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 21.8% |
| Range | 17.5% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 11.1% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Zimbabweans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Laotian (11.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Sri Lankan (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Bulgarian (11.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Sweden (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.0% |