Immigrants from the Azores vs Chickasaw Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Chickasaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Chickasaw
14.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chickasaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,257,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 7.1%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 7.2% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 21.5% | 52.4% |
Range | 14.3% | 43.9% |
Mean | 13.7% | 22.5% |
Median | 13.1% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 23.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Chickasaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Osage (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Chippewa (14.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |