Immigrants vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants
Chickasaw
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,523,974 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 50.5%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 47.4% | 51.4% |
Range | 46.2% | 49.5% |
Mean | 10.2% | 23.7% |
Median | 9.9% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Albania (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ecuador (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Syria (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
South Africans | 93.3 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Syria | 93.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 92.8 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |