Polish vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Polish
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Poles
Chickasaw
11.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
42.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,533,699 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.572 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 42.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 51.4% |
| Range | 96.7% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 23.7% |
| Median | 12.0% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Poles by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Barbados (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Caribbean (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (11.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.9 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Italians | 55.6 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 51.8 /100 | #173 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.3% |
| Czechs | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 11.3% |
| Ugandans | 43.7 /100 | #176 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 42.2 /100 | #177 | Average 11.3% |
| Poles | 42.0 /100 | #178 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 41.6 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 41.5 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 40.8 /100 | #181 | Average 11.4% |
| Icelanders | 39.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 39.5 /100 | #183 | Fair 11.4% |
| Kenyans | 39.2 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.4% |
| Danes | 36.8 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |