Guyanese vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,764,315 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,374,606 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.6%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guyanese	Immigrants from Scotland
Minimum	0.73%	1.3%
Maximum	20.7%	66.1%
Range	19.9%	64.9%
Mean	11.0%	14.1%
Median	10.9%	10.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.5%	9.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.3%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.8%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.3%	11.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	11.3%

Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Immigrants from Scotland by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from North America (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Canada (11.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from England (11.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 10.7%
Costa Ricans	91.4 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Scotland	91.3 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 10.7%
Australians	90.7 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 10.8%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	90.6 /100 \| #142	Exceptional 10.8%
Sierra Leoneans	89.7 /100 \| #143	Excellent 10.8%
Lithuanians	88.7 /100 \| #144	Excellent 10.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	85.6 /100 \| #145	Excellent 10.9%
South American Indians	83.5 /100 \| #146	Excellent 10.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	83.4 /100 \| #147	Excellent 10.9%
Arabs	82.7 /100 \| #148	Excellent 10.9%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	81.1 /100 \| #149	Excellent 10.9%
Syrians	79.8 /100 \| #150	Good 11.0%
New Zealanders	79.3 /100 \| #151	Good 11.0%
Ukrainians	78.0 /100 \| #152	Good 11.0%
Immigrants \| England	77.4 /100 \| #153	Good 11.0%
Immigrants \| Canada	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 11.0%
Moroccans	76.4 /100 \| #155	Good 11.0%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	76.2 /100 \| #156	Good 11.0%
Guyanese	75.1 /100 \| #157	Good 11.0%
Immigrants \| North America	74.9 /100 \| #158	Good 11.0%