Iroquois vs Inupiat Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Iroquois
Inupiat
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Iroquois
Inupiat
22.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Inupiat Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,992,045 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,492,262 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 22.0%, a difference of 0.090%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Inupiat |
Minimum | 1.6% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 66.3% | 81.2% |
Range | 64.7% | 75.5% |
Mean | 31.3% | 32.0% |
Median | 25.7% | 23.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.9% | 46.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 28.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Inupiat by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Central America (22.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (22.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Chickasaw (21.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Guatemala (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (22.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.91%), Chickasaw (21.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 21.6% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 21.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 21.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 21.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 21.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 21.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 22.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 22.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 22.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 22.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 22.8% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 23.0% |