Hopi vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Hopi
Lithuanian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Hopi
Lithuanians
79.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,731,865 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 79.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,576,687 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 8.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hopi | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 28.6% | 59.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 71.4% | 40.4% |
| Mean | 71.5% | 87.7% |
| Median | 67.8% | 87.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.9% | 82.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.6% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.7% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 10.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Hopi by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Sweden (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.5% |