Choctaw vs Turkish Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Choctaw
Turkish
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Choctaw
Turks
16.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Turkish Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,671,610 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 70.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 23.1% |
| Range | 47.8% | 21.2% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 9.7% |
| Median | 25.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.9% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Indonesia (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cuba (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Turkey (9.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.7% |