Choctaw vs Seminole Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Choctaw
Seminole
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Choctaw
Seminole
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Seminole Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,048,868 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.29%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Seminole |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 31.9% | 26.3% |
Range | 30.0% | 25.4% |
Mean | 7.2% | 6.4% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Seminole by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Comanche (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 5.4% |
South Americans | 8.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 8.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.4% |
Brazilians | 7.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.5% |
Nicaraguans | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.5% |