Choctaw vs Tsimshian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Choctaw
Tsimshian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Choctaw
Tsimshian
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,620,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 31.9% | 13.3% |
Range | 30.0% | 10.9% |
Mean | 7.2% | 7.1% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Tsimshian by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alsatian (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Spaniard (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |