Choctaw vs Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Choctaw
Ute
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Choctaw
Ute
18.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Ute Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,245,536 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Ute |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 73.9% | 70.6% |
| Range | 70.3% | 64.1% |
| Mean | 28.4% | 32.1% |
| Median | 24.9% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 48.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 30.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 19.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Yakama (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 19.2% |