Choctaw vs Uruguayan Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Choctaw
Uruguayan
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Choctaw
Uruguayans
18.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Uruguayan Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,245,536 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,910,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 35.4%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 3.6% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 73.9% | 38.9% |
Range | 70.3% | 32.1% |
Mean | 28.4% | 16.1% |
Median | 24.9% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.7% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 8.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Ute (17.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from South America (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Colombia (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Ugandan (13.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and British (13.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Slavs | 75.7 /100 | #152 | Good 13.2% |
Northern Europeans | 73.7 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Arabs | 73.5 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 72.9 /100 | #155 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 72.0 /100 | #156 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 70.3 /100 | #157 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 69.2 /100 | #158 | Good 13.3% |
Uruguayans | 66.9 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | South America | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Icelanders | 65.7 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Ugandans | 64.1 /100 | #162 | Good 13.4% |
British | 63.5 /100 | #163 | Good 13.4% |
Swiss | 61.7 /100 | #164 | Good 13.4% |
Basques | 59.3 /100 | #165 | Average 13.4% |
Belgians | 58.9 /100 | #166 | Average 13.4% |