Choctaw vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Choctaw
Bhutanese
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Choctaw
Bhutanese
18.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,245,536 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,147,907 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 57.8%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 73.9% | 33.8% |
Range | 70.3% | 31.9% |
Mean | 28.4% | 11.5% |
Median | 24.9% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.1% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Ute (17.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Greece (11.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.6% |