Zimbabwean vs Australian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Australian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Australians
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Australian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,162,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,701,792 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.27%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Australian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 15.3% | 73.3% |
Range | 14.0% | 70.9% |
Mean | 6.2% | 10.0% |
Median | 6.1% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 11.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Australians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Korean (7.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Belgium (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Belgium (7.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |