Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from China
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,162,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.48%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 22.2% |
| Range | 14.0% | 21.2% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.5% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Korean (7.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (7.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Finns | 98.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Europeans | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |