Zimbabwean vs English Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
English
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
English
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs English Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,162,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,938,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 1.1%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | English |
Minimum | 1.2% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 15.3% | 75.3% |
Range | 14.0% | 71.9% |
Mean | 6.2% | 14.1% |
Median | 6.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and English by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Korean (7.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Northern European (7.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (7.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Irish (7.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North America (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Macedonians | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |