Immigrants from Nepal vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Pennsylvania German
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Pennsylvania Germans
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,688,907 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,998,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.50%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.0% | 96.6% |
Mean | 13.1% | 19.5% |
Median | 12.4% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 21.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Pennsylvania Germans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |