Colombian vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty
COMPARE
Colombian
Pennsylvania German
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Colombians
Pennsylvania Germans
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,235,280 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,998,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colombian | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 16.5% | 96.6% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 19.5% |
| Median | 13.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians and Pennsylvania Germans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |