Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Ethiopia
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,667,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Minimum | 0.74% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 28.7% |
Range | 29.9% | 28.3% |
Mean | 12.5% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.9% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |