Korean vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Chippewa
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,402,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 18.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Korean | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.27% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 18.2% | 34.1% |
Range | 17.9% | 32.9% |
Mean | 4.6% | 8.4% |
Median | 4.3% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Koreans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Italy (4.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (4.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Norway (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 98.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |