English vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
English
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
English
Chippewa
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 562,851,245 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 28.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 58.9% | 34.1% |
| Range | 57.6% | 32.9% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 8.4% |
| Median | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to English by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to English are European (4.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Iranian (4.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Belgian (4.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Dutch (4.2%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |