Immigrants from West Indies vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from West Indies
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from West Indies
Chippewa
6.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from West Indies vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,419,228 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from West Indies and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from West Indies | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 17.4% | 34.1% |
Range | 16.2% | 32.9% |
Mean | 6.3% | 8.4% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from West Indies by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from West Indies are Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |