Ugandan vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Chippewa
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
31.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,779,769 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.62% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 34.1% |
Range | 22.2% | 32.9% |
Mean | 6.3% | 8.4% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |