Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,743,744 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bulgaria and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 36.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bulgaria	Chickasaw
Minimum	2.6%	3.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	97.4%	96.2%
Mean	17.9%	26.8%
Median	10.4%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.3%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.8%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.5%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.4%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.8%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria are Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%