Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,830,087 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 21.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Germany	Chickasaw
Minimum	9.6%	3.8%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	90.4%	96.2%
Mean	33.7%	26.8%
Median	21.5%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.4%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.3%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	28.9%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	27.6%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	26.9%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Guamanians/Chamorros	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Slovaks	75.2 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
French	72.8 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	72.0 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
French Canadians	68.7 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%
Costa Ricans	64.2 /100 \| #169	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	64.2 /100 \| #170	Good 16.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	64.0 /100 \| #171	Good 16.2%
Afghans	62.3 /100 \| #172	Good 16.2%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%