Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,792,725 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 16.8%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Chickasaw
Minimum	3.2%	3.8%
Maximum	42.0%	100.0%
Range	38.8%	96.2%
Mean	16.5%	26.8%
Median	15.1%	21.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.5%	17.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.2%	31.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.7%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.1%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.0%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Arab (16.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	43.1 /100 \| #182	Average 16.6%
Immigrants \| Portugal	42.5 /100 \| #183	Average 16.6%
Scotch-Irish	39.6 /100 \| #184	Fair 16.7%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	35.6 /100 \| #185	Fair 16.7%
South American Indians	35.0 /100 \| #186	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	34.6 /100 \| #187	Fair 16.8%
Arabs	34.5 /100 \| #188	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 16.8%
Kenyans	32.3 /100 \| #190	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Azores	31.3 /100 \| #191	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Uganda	31.3 /100 \| #192	Fair 16.8%
Aleuts	28.7 /100 \| #193	Fair 16.9%
Spanish	28.6 /100 \| #194	Fair 16.9%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	25.6 /100 \| #195	Fair 17.0%
Celtics	25.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 17.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%