Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chickasaw
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,135,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 29.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 43.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.6% | 96.2% |
Mean | 16.8% | 26.8% |
Median | 15.3% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |